When people describe something as natural, they might mean it is good, acceptable, safe or healthy. When something is described as unnatural, people can mean it is bad, unacceptable or dangerous. Views about what is natural or unnatural can affect the development and uptake of new technologies.

This project examined how ideas about naturalness feature in and affect public discussions about the ethics of science, technology and medicine. We enlisted poets to help us to explore these ideas in a creative way. Our recommendations aim to improve communication and understanding between people with different views about naturalness.

The report

(un)natural: Ideas about naturalness in public and political debates about science, technology and medicine

Published: December 2015

Guide to report

Printed copies

Order a printed copy of this report or the short guide.

Full reportUK Delivery£10Unavailable
Delivery outside UK£15Unavailable
Short guideFreeRequest copy

Key recommendations

    Previous work

    Contact us

    Nuffield Council on Bioethics
    28 Bedford Square
    London, WC1B 3JS

    Tel: +44 (0)20 7681 9619

    General enquiries:

    Press enquiries:

    Sign up for e-news


    Explore by topic