Exploring public views on assisted dying

Our project

Our work seeks to explore public views on assisted dying in England and the associated social, ethical, and practical considerations that people consider important in forming their views and in their deliberations.

We commissioned Hopkins Van Mil, partnering with M.E.L Research and the Sortition Foundation to design, facilitate, and organise a series of surveys and a Citizens’ Jury to unpack people's perspectives on assisted dying and the associated social, ethical, and practical considerations that underpin them.

This project is being overseen by an Advisory Board. The project team is also being supported by a Content Group. This project is funded by a grant from the AB Charitable Trust.

Interim report

On 13 September 2024, an interim report focusing on how the Citizens' Jury members voted on the Jury questions was published. This report presents initial insights into the main votes and the key recommendations in the words of the Jury members, with some contextual information to explain the deliberative process.

Read the interim report of the Jury’s key findings and voting.

Background

Assisted dying is a highly complex, sensitive, and ethically charged topic. Many jurisdictions worldwide do not permit assisted dying but there has been an increasing number considering or passing legislation to permit it in recent years.

Some form of assisted dying is legal in at least 27 jurisdictions, including all six states in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Switzerland, Belgium, ten states in the USA, and the Netherlands. The law in jurisdictions that permit some form of assisted dying varies on eligibility and governance.

Whilst assisted dying is not permitted in England, and despite the longstanding ethical debate on the topic, there is a gap in robust qualitative evidence on public views towards assisted dying and the underpinning social, ethical, and practical issues raised by the subject in England. Most available data exploring public perspectives on assisted dying in England are based on opinion polls which often do not capture relevant complexities involved. This lack of in-depth evidence is frequently referenced in political discussions as a reason for not revisiting the topic and when we engaged with experts across the UK Government and the health policy sector, we heard that quality evidence on public opinion would be a welcome contribution to informing the conversation on assisted dying.

Contact us

If you would like to contact us about this project, please email us on ADpublicengagement@nuffieldbioethics.org

To speak to a member of our Press team, please call: +44 (0)7436 931958